EFFECT OF ECOSIL AND VITAMIN C PREPARATIONS ON THE ECONOMIC AND BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF YOUNG PIGS

The article’s authors argue that it is necessary to use adsorbents and antioxidant preparations in diets to level the negative factors of the impact of aflatoxin B1 on the processes of digestive metabolism and the productivity of young pigs when fattening on diets with a tolerant content of this mycotoxin. The research aimed to determine the effect of the preparation of Ecosil and vitamin C on the economic and biological characteristics of young pigs fed on diets with tolerant levels of aflatoxin B1. In the course of the study and based on experience, the authors found that the gilts of the 3rd experimental group had a higher growth intensity, which had an advantage over the animals of the control group in absolute and average daily gain by 10.5% (P<0.05) when enriched compound feed with a mixture of Ecosil and vitamin C. The authors managed to achieve in animals of the 3rd experimental group a reduction in costs per 1 kg of absolute gain - EFU (energy feed unit) by 9.45% and digestible Protein by 9.48% against control due to improved detoxification of the studied toxin. The coefficient of dry matter digestibility in gilts of this group was higher than in control by 3.1% (P><0.05); the organic matter was higher by 3.2% (P><0.05); crude Protein was higher by 3.2% (P><0.05); fiber is higher by 3.4% (P><0.05) and NFE (nitrogen-free extract) by 2.7% with a decrease in the digestibility of crude fat by 2.8% (P><0.05). The authors found that gilts of the 3rd experimental group, who consumed a mixture of tested feed additives per day in the accounting period of the study, deposited 24.86 g of nitrogen in the body, which is significantly (P><0.05) more than the control analogs - by 2.85 g. In addition, the animals of the 3rd experimental group absorbed better calcium and phosphorus in the diet.>˂0.05) when enriched compound feed with a mixture of Ecosil and vitamin C. The authors managed to achieve in animals of the 3rd experimental group a reduction in costs per 1 kg of absolute gain - EFU (energy feed unit) by 9.45% and digestible Protein by 9.48% against control due to improved detoxification of the studied toxin. The coefficient of dry matter digestibility in gilts of this group was higher than in control by 3.1% (P˂0.05); the organic matter was higher by 3.2% (P˂0.05); crude Protein was higher by 3.2% (P˂0.05); fiber is higher by 3.4% (P˂0.05) and NFE (nitrogen-free extract) by 2.7% with a decrease in the digestibility of crude fat by 2.8% (P˂0.05). The authors found that gilts of the 3rd experimental group, who consumed a mixture of tested feed additives per day in the accounting period of the study, deposited 24.86 g of nitrogen in the body, which is significantly (P˂0.05) more than the control analogs - by 2.85 g. In addition, the animals of the 3rd experimental group absorbed better calcium and phosphorus in the diet.

1. Gurcieva D.O. Ispol’zovanie sovremennyh tekhnologij v sel’skom hozyajstve i pishchevoj promyshlennosti (The use of modern technologies in agriculture and the food industry), Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference of Students, Postgraduates and Young Scientists, Persianovsky, 201, pp. 380–381. (In Russ.)

2. Calieva L.V., Temiraev R.B., Balikoeva F.R., Pyshmanceva N.A., Myasnaya industriya, 2011, No. 11, pp. 36–38. (In Russ.)

3. Kairov V.R., Gazzaeva M.S., Karaeva Z.A., Ramonova Z.G., Kabanov A.Ch., Izvestiya Gorskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2015, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 56–61. (In Russ.)

4. Burnaceva Z.V., Temiraev R.B., Kokaeva M.G., Baeva Z.T., Plieva Z.K., Lamarton S.F., Innovacii i prodovol’stvennaya bezopasnost’, 2019, No. 1 (23), pp. 103–108. (In Russ.)

5. Baeva Z.T., Copanova Z.Ya., Agrarnaya Rossiya, 2012, No. 3, pp. 45–47. (In Russ.)

6. Temiraev R., Kairov V., Hamicaeva E., Tuaeva T., Gasieva V., Kombikorma, 2008, No. 4, pp. 70. (In Russ.)

7. Temiraev R.B., Calieva L.V., Plieva I.G., Dzuceva M.R., Izvestiya Gorskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2010, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 85–87. (In Russ.)

8. Temiraev R.B., Ibragimova Z.R., Albegova L.H., Gadieva M.Sh., Bagaeva A.T., Abaeva S.K., Hranenie i pererabotka sel’hozsyr’ya, 2007, No. 11, pp. 74–76. (In Russ.)

9. Vorokov V.H., Temiraev R.B., Stolbovskaya A.A., Ceboeva Yu.S., Myasnaya industriya, 2011, No. 10, pp. 25–27. (In Russ.)

10. Gadzaonov R.H., Stolbovskaya A.A., Baeva A.A., Kibizov G.K., Pticevodstvo, 2009, No. 4, pp. 23– 24. (In Russ.)

11. Sencova D.O., Temiraev R.B., Kozyrev S.G., Baeva A.A., Baeva Z.T., Kubatieva (Gutieva) Z.A., Mamukaev M.N., Izvestiya Gorskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2018, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 115–120. (In Russ.)

12. Kalashnikov A.P. [i dr.], Normy i raciony kormleniya sel’skohozyajstvennyh zhivotnyh (Norms and rations of feeding of farm animals), Moscow: Kolos, 2003, 456 p.

13. Temiraev R.B., Dzodzieva E.S., Kokaeva M.G., Calieva L.V., Kabulova Z.Z., Myasnaya industriya, 2015, No. 3, pp. 16–18. (In Russ.)

14. Platikanov N.D. Metodika opredeleniya perevarimosti kormov i racionov, Moscow, 1969, pp. 23–29. (In Russ.)