OF THE LONGEST BACK MUSCLE OF KEMEROVO PIGS AND THEIR CROSSBREEDS WITH COMMERCIAL BREEDS
https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2020-30-4-138-145
Abstract
The results of the assessment of the amino acid profile of the longest muscle of the back of the Kemerovo breed of pigs and its two-breed and three-breed crosses with commercial breeds are presented. The largest amount of amino acids is found in the meat of purebred animals in comparison with two- and threebreed animals. In terms of the content of such amino acids as phenylalanine, aspartic acid, serine, glutamic acid, purebred animals significantly exceeded hybrids. It was shown that the studied groups of animals for all amino acids exceeded the FAO reference values, with the exception of lysine. The influence of gender on the amino acid composition of meat in purebred animals was revealed, since boars significantly exceeded pigs in 8 amino acids out of 17 studied. Reliable correlation coefficients were established between the content of a number of amino acids in meat samples, which coincide in all groups of pigs.
About the Authors
S. M. Chydym
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Graduate Student
M. L. Kochneva
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor
K. V. Zhuchaev
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor
V. V. Garth
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor
E. A. Borisenko
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor
References
1. Dunin I.M., Pavlova S.V. Sostoyanie plemennoj bazy svinovodstva Rossii // Farm Animals. – 2015. – № 1 (8). – S. 50–52.
2. Ispol’zovanie bioresursov svinovodstva v povyshenii myasnyh kachestv svininy / V.A. Bekenyov, V.S. Deeva, A.A. Arishin [i dr.] // Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. – 2016. – № 3 (40). – S. 176–184.
3. Racional’noe ispol’zovanie genofonda cennyh porod zhivotnyh s cel’yu sohraneniya biologicheskogo raznoobraziya/ M.B. Ulimbashev, V.V. Kulincev, M.I. Selionova [i dr.] // YUg Rossii: ekologiya, razvitie. – 2018. – № 2. – S. 165–183.
4. Kim J.H., Son M.H., Cho J.S. Purified protein and oligopeptide mixture preparation from pork meat and evaluation of their nutritive value: True digestibility, biological value, and net protein utilization // Korean journal of food and cookery science. – 2007. – T. 23, N 5. – C. 644–649.
5. Amino acid composition of pig meat in relation to live weight and sex / R. Okrouhla, J. Stupka, M. Čitek [et.al.] // Czech J. Anim. Sci. – 2006. – N 51. – P. 529–534.
6. Tessari P., Lante A., Mosca G. Essential amino acids: master regulators of nutrition and environmental footprint // Scientific reports. – 2016. – T. 6. – C. 260–274.
7. Lopez M.J. Mohiuddin S.S. Biochemistry, Essential Amino Acids // StatPearls [Internet]. – StatPearls Publishing. – 2020.
8. Factors contributing to the selection of dietary protein food sources / R.R. Wolfe [et al.] // Clinical Nutrition. – 2018. – T. 37, N. 1. – C. 130–138.
9. Food products as sources of protein and amino acids – The case of Poland / Górska-Warsewicz H. [et al.] // Nutrients. – 2018. – T. 10, N 12. – C. 1977–1997.
10. Hoffer L.J. Human protein and amino acid requirements //Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. – 2016. – T. 40, N 4. – S. 460–474.
11. Tihonov V.N., Bobovich V.E. Proiskhozhdenie genoma Sus scrofa domestica v processe mikroevolyucii pri sozdanii novyh porod // Sel’skohozyajstvennaya biologiya. – 2007. – T. 42, № 2. – S. 1–12.
12. Molecular tools and analytical approaches for the characterization of farm animal genetic diversity / J.A. Lenstra [et al.] // Animal Genetics. – 2012. – T. 43, N. 5. – C. 483–502.
13. CHydym S.M., Kochneva M.L., ZHuchaev K.V. Polimorfizm STR-markerov kemerovskoj porody svinej // Teoriya i praktika sovremennoj agrarnoj nauki: sb. III nac. (vseros.) nauch. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem / Novosib. gos. agrar. un-t. – Novosibirsk, 2020. – S. 330–332.
14. Kemerovskaya poroda svinej / I.I. Gudilin, V.N. Dement’ev [i dr.] – Novosibirsk: RPO SO RASKHN, 2003. – 388 s.
15. Joint WHO/FAO/UNU Expert Consultation. Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. – 2007. – N 935. – P. 1–265.
16. Barannikov V.A., Tarichenko A.I., Barilo O.R. Biologicheskie osobennosti svininy pri ispol’zovanii v kormlenii antistressovyh preparatov // Agrarnyj vestnik Urala. – 2013. – № 9 – C. 25–28.
17. Petuhova M.A. Aminokislotnyj sostav i biologicheskaya cennost» belkov myasa svinej razlichnyh genotipov // Doklady Nacional’noj akademii nauk Belarusi. Agrarnye nauki. – 2015. – № 2, T. 59. – S. 118–122.
Review
For citations:
Chydym S.M., Kochneva M.L., Zhuchaev K.V., Garth V.V., Borisenko E.A. OF THE LONGEST BACK MUSCLE OF KEMEROVO PIGS AND THEIR CROSSBREEDS WITH COMMERCIAL BREEDS. Innovations and Food Safety. 2020;(4):138-145. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2020-30-4-138-145
Views:
254
Email this article 