ECOLOGY OF AGRICULTURAL RAW MATERIALS
https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2020-30-4-35-40
Abstract
The priority route of entry of carcinogens into the body of the population of the Chelyabinsk region is oral, the leading medium for the transfer of xenobiotics is food, and the main carcinogen is arsenic, which comes from local agricultural products. The aim of the research was to study the mineral composition of semi-finished products from poultry meat from different manufacturing enterprises in the context of the environmental component of the safety of agricultural products. Chilled drumsticks produced by Nagaybaksky Poultry Complex LLC (Chelyabinsk Region, Nagaybaksky District, Farshampenuaz settlement) and Turbaslinskiye Broilers JSC (Republic of Bashkortostan, Blagoveshchensk) were used as objects of research. It was established that the maximum permissible concentration for arsenic was 3.7 times higher in the products of the Nagaybak poultry complex. Chromium was found more in semi-finished products from Bashkortostan (29 times), tin – in local raw materials. The drumsticks cooled from the Nagaybak processor significantly exceeded the competitor’s raw materials in terms of calcium (7.6 times), iron (2.9 times), zinc (2.1 times), selenium (2 times), phosphorus (1, 5 times), silicon (1.3 times), sodium (12.4%), as well as copper, manganese, molybdenum, tungsten, strontium. Relatively high levels of potassium (3.8 times) and magnesium (1.4 times), as well as aluminum, lithium, nickel, antimony, were recorded in the drumsticks of broiler chickens from a Bashkir producer. It was revealed that the semi-finished products of broiler chickens produced by Nagaybak Poultry Complex LLC did not comply with the requirements of Technical Regulation of the Customs Union 021/2011. The chilled shins of Bashkir production were recognized as safe within the framework of the current Technical Regulations.
About the Authors
A. A. LukinRussian Federation
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor
Yu. A. Becz
Graduate Student
N. L. Naumova
Undergradute
I. A. Rodionova
Candidate of Veterinary Science, Associate Professor
References
1. Ural’shin A.G., Valeullina N.N., Brylina N.A. Ocenka kancerogen-nogo riska dlya zdorov’ya naseleniya g. CHelyabinska pri mnogosredovom voz-dejstvii himicheskih faktorov okruzhayushchej sredy // Fundamental’nye i prikladnye aspekty analiza zdorov’yu naseleniya: materialy Vseros. nauch. – prakt. konf. molodyh uchenyh i specialistov Rospotrebnadzora: v 2 t. / pod red. G.G. Onishchenko, N.V. Zajcevoj. – Perm’: Knizhnyj format, 2012. – T. 2. – S. 232–236.
2. Pomazunova E.V., Koptyakova S.V. Ekologicheskie problemy v mono-gorodah promyshlennoj territorii YUzhnogo Urala i puti ih resheniya // Rossijskie regiony v fokuse peremen: sb. dokl. XIII Mezhdunar. konf. – Eka-terinburg. – 2019. – S. 149–155.
3. Pyzheva, YU.I., Zander E.V. Ekonomicheskie aspekty resheniya ekolo-gicheskih problem rossijskih gorodov // Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo. – 2019. – T. 12, № 5. – S. 111–120.
4. Segeda, A.S., Gafurova V.M. Ekologicheskie problemy monogorodov i puti ih resheniya (na primere goroda Magnitogorska) // Rossijskie regio-ny v fokuse peremen: sb. dokl. XIII Mezhdunar. konf. – Ekaterinburg. – 2019. – S. 167–171.
5. Prokof’eva M.A., YAntilina G.M. Ekologiya gorodov Respubliki Bashkortostan // Rol» i znachenie sovremennoj nauki i tekhniki dlya razvitiya sovremennogo obshchestva: sb. st. mezhdunar. nauch. – prakt. konf. – Ufa. – 2017. – S. 12–15.
6. Martirosyan K.K., YArmuhametov R.Z., Trofimova O.A. Vliyanie pro-myshlennyh predpriyatij na ekologiyu Bashkortostana // Ekologicheskie pro-blemy YUzhnogo Urala i puti ih resheniya: Materialy Vseros. nauch. – praktich. konf. – Sibaj. – 2017. – S. 238–240.
7. Ekologiya i zdorov’e naseleniya Respubliki Bashkortostan / L.M. Ka-ramova, A.B. Bakirov, G.R. Basharova, R.A. Sulejmanov. – Ufa, 2017. – 268 s.
8. Sulejmanov R.A., Rahmatullin N.R., Valeev T.K. Osnovnye rezul’ta-ty i perspektivy nauchnyh issledovanij po problemam gigieny okruzhayu-shchej sredy v Respublike Bashkortostan // Medicina truda i ekologiya chelo-veka. – 2015. – № 3. – S. 206–210.
9. BakirovA.B.Problemy sohraneniya zdorov’ya rabotayushchego nasele-niya v Respublike Bashkortostan // Medicina truda i ekologiya cheloveka. – 2016. – № 4 (8). – S. 5–11.
10. Ahmetshin R.R. Ekologicheskie problemy Respubliki Bashkorto-stan // Nauchno-prakticheskie issledovaniya. – 2017. – № 4 (4). – S. 6–7.
11. Stepanova I.P., Postnova T.V., Savin M.R. Ekologicheskoe soder-zhanie mysh’yaka v produktah pitaniya, realizuemyh na territorii omskoj oblasti // Nauchnoe obozrenie. Biologicheskie nauki. – 2018. – № 6. – S. 20–24.
12. Design of an epidemiologic study of drinking water arsenic exposure and skin and bladder cancer risk in a U.S. population / M.R. Karagas, T.D. Tos-teson, J. Blum [et al.] // Environmental health perspectives. – 1998. – Vol. 106. – R. 1047–1050.
13. Arsenic exposure, genetic susceptibility and leukocyte telomere length in an Italian young adult population / A. Borghini, F. Faita, A. Mercuri [et al.] // Original manuscript advance access publication. – 2016. – 15 April. – R. 539–546.
14. Kotkova T.V., Petrakov E.S. Vliyanie laktobakterij v komplekse s selenom na mineral’nyj obmen cyplyat-brojlerov // Vestnik APK Stavro-pol’ya. – 2015. – № S1. – S. 120–123.
15. Poluchenie ekologicheski bezopasnogo myasa brojlerov v usloviyah tekhnogennoj agroekosfery / O.A. Gumenyuk, G.V. Meshcheryakova, S.S. SHakiro-va, O.G. Loretc, O.A. Bykova // Agrarnyj vestnik Urala. – 2019. – № 1 (180). – S. 51–57.
16. Tarantin A.V., Zemlyanova M.A. Essencial’naya rol» i toksicheskie effekty vanadiya // Ekologiya cheloveka. – 2015. – № 12. – S. 59–64.
Review
For citations:
Lukin A.A., Becz Yu.A., Naumova N.L., Rodionova I.A. ECOLOGY OF AGRICULTURAL RAW MATERIALS. Innovations and Food Safety. 2020;(4):35-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2020-30-4-35-40