BREEDING AND INDUSTRIAL GROUPS OF FULL-AGING COWS OF RED STEP BREED

<p>An assessment of the population of red steppe breed cows by exterior and productive characteristics in the formation of production groups allocated for the degree of development of live weight, assessment of the exterior, milk yield, milk fat, milk fat, kg. The following selection parameters were calculated: for live weight - selection group X≥595 kg, production 595> X≥514 kg, marriage X<514; assessment of the exterior – selection group X≥9,46, production 9,46> X≥7,78, marriage X<7,78; for a milk yield for 305 days of lactation, a selection group X≥4481 kg, production 4481> X≥2829 kg, marriage X <2829 kg; milk fat content – selection group X≥4,35 kg, production 4,35> X≥3,99 kg, marriage X<3,99; milk fat - selection group X≥186 kg, production group 186> X≥118kg, marriage X<118 kg. Comparative assessment of the herd shows that animals of the breeding group in live weight by 18,7% exceed the breed standard, in milk yield by 8,7%, in milk fat 20,7%. Evaluation of animal grouping by milk yield shows that cows of a selection group exceed the breed standard by live weight by 6,1%, milk yield by 38,5%, milk fat by 54,3% Animals of the breeding group for milk fat exceed the breed standard by 6,1% in live weight, 36%, in milk yield, in milk fat 53,8%. The selection of the breeding group by body weight contributes to the formation of an array of animals of tall, stretched type with increased milk yield and milk fat. Cows with high milk yield differ from their peers in their greater body weight, milk yield index and milk fat productivity, and have a stretched and wide-grip physique. Uterus with high productivity in milk fat differ from their peers in greater body weight, milk yield, milk yield index, and have a more stretched constitution. For most of the identified dependencies, a significant difference was noted between the traits of different breeding groups. It should be noted that, regardless of the choice of the main feature, there is a tendency to form an array of animals that are distinguished by tall and stretched physique.</p>

cattle, red steppe breed, selection and production groups, selection, cows, exterior, productivity, animal groups, selection parameters

1. Dmitriev N. G. Porody skota po stranam mira. Spravochnaja kniga. – Leningrad: Kolos, 1978. –351s.

2. Brusnicin A. F. Molochnoe skotovodstvo Sibiri. – Sibkrajizdat, 1930. –338s.

3. Il’in V. V. Izuchenie nekotoryh produktivnyh i biologicheskih osobenno-stej krasnogo stepnogo skota Altajskogo kraja/V.V. Il’in, A. I. Zheltikov, O. S. Korotkevich//Dostizhenija nauki i tehniki APK. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 68–71.

4. Knjazeva T. A. Ispol’zovanie bykov krasnoj shvedskoj porody dlja povyshe-nija kachestvennyh pokazatelej moloka krasnogo stepnogo skota/ T. A. Knjaze-va, P. M. Vasilik//Molochnoe i mjasnoe skotovodstvo. – 2010. –№ 5. – S. 37–40.

5. Bogomolova E. F. Harakteristika populjacii krasnogo stepnogo skota Ne-meckogo nacional’nogo rajona po osnovnym pokazateljam produktivnosti/ E. F. Bogomolova, T. N. Sticij//Vestnik Altajskogo gosudarstvennogo ag-rarnogo universiteta. 2003. № 2 (10). S. 251–255.

6. Knjazeva T. A. Krasnaja stepnaja poroda skota: rezul’tat jeffektivnoj selek-cii// Molochnaja promyshlennost». 2013. № 7. S. 14.

7. Dubrovin A. I. Ocenka jeffektivnosti ispol’zovanija zhivotnyh krasnoj stepnoj (kubanskij tip) i chjorno-pjostroj golshtinizirovannoj porod v mo-lochnom skotovodstve/ A. I. Dubrovin, L. A. Shevhuzheva, M. Je. Tekeev// Iz-vestija Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2015. № 41. S. 94–99.

8. Tukfatulin G. S. Kachestvo slivochnogo masla korov cherno-pestroj i krasnoj stepnoj porod s uchetom ih povedencheskoj aktivnosti/ G. S. Tukfatulin, G. B. Pichelauri//Izvestija Gorskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universi-teta. 2016. T. 53. № 4. S. 117–123.

9. Knjazeva T. A. Jekster’ernye osobennosti tipov krasnoj stepnoj porody krupnogo rogatogo skota/ T. A. Knjazeva, V. M. Tjurikov//Molochnoe i mjasnoe skotovodstvo. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 14–16.

10. Il’in V. V. Vosproizvoditel’naja sposobnost» bykov-proizvoditelej kras-nyh porod altajskogo kraja/ V. V. Il’in, A. I. Zheltikov, O. S. Korotkevich, V. G. Marenkov, N. N. Kochnev//Glavnyj zootehnik. 2012. – № 3. – S. 6–10.

11. Gukezhev V. M. Vlijanie genotipa uluchshajushhih porod na povyshenie jeffek-tivnosti ispol’zovanija krasnoj stepnoj porody/ V. M. Gukezhev, M. S. Gaba-ev// Jeffektivnoe zhivotnovodstvo. 2016. № 5 (126). S. 28–29.

12. Gorlov I. F. Vlijanie skreshhivanija korov krasnoj stepnoj porody s bykami anglerskoj porody na molochnuju produktivnost» i morfofunkcional’nye osobennosti vymeni/ I. F. Gorlov, A. A. Kajdulina, M. I. Slozhenkina, N. I. Mosolova, T. N. Barmina, S. A. Surkova// Agrarno-pishhevye innovacii. 2018. № 3 (3). S. 34–37.

13. Kajdulina A. A. Itogi sovershenstvovanija skota krasnoj stepnoj porody v uslovijah Nizhnego Povolzh’ja/ A. A. Kajdulina, V. S. Grishin, S. A. Surkova, T. N. Barmina, P. S. Andreev-Chadaev// Agrarno-pishhevye innovacii. 2019. № 1 (5). S. 40–45.

14. Knjazeva T. A. Ispol’zovanie bykov krasnoj shvedskoj porody dlja povyshe-nija kachestvennyh pokazatelej moloka krasnogo stepnogo skota/ T. A. Knjaze-va, P. M. Vasilik//Molochnoe i mjasnoe skotovodstvo. – 2010. –№ 5. – S. 37–40.

15. Gukezhev V. M. Strategija vybora optimal’nogo sootnoshenija velichiny udoja i vyhoda priploda/ V. M. Gukezhev, M. S. Gabaev, Zh.H. Zhashuev, M. A. Gubzho-kov// Innovacii i prodovol’stvennaja bezopasnost». 2018. № 4 (22). S. 130–137.

16. Trufanov V. G. Molochnaja produktivnost» korov holmogorskoj porody raz-nyh proizvodstvennyh tipov – Vestnik selekcionnoj nauki i praktiki v zhivotnovodstve Rossii (Vypusk 1) – Moskovskaja obl., Lesnye Poljany, 2003. – S.37–40.

17. Symanovich O. V. Vlijanie bykov-proizvoditelej irmenskogo i priobskogo tipov na belkovomolochnost» i drugie hozjajstvenno-poleznye priznaki chjorno-pjostrogo skota Sibiri: Avtoref. diss… kand. s. – h. nauk -Novosibirsk, 2009. –18s.

18. Temmoev M. I. Hozjajstvenno poleznye kachestva krasnogo stepnogo skota raznyh proizvodstvennyh tipov// Vestnik Altajskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2017. № 5 (151). – S. 108–112.

19. Vostrý L. Selection of a suitable definition of environment for the estimation of genotype × environment interaction in the weaning weight of beef cattle/ L. Vostrý, J. Přibyl, V. Jakubec, Z. Veselá, I. Majzlík // Czech J. Anim. Sci., 53 (2008): pp 407–417.

20. Plohinskij N. A. Biometrija. – Novosibirsk: izd-vo SO AN SSSR, 1961. – 366 s.