Preview

Innovations and Food Safety

Advanced search

Effect of zinc chelate on slaughter and liver morphology of quail

https://doi.org/10.31677/2311-0651-2024-46-4-35-42

Abstract

The inclusion of zinc chelate complex in the diet has a positive effect on meat productivity. There is an increase in the mass of the carcass, internal organs, and a slaughter yield increases. The largest 37-day mass of the carcass was detected in the 2nd experimental group (Biocinc 0,2 mL/kg), it was 79,87 ± 7,69 g (р ≤ 0,001), thereby the slaughter yield was 74,4 %, which is 16,6% more than in the control group. The largest weight of 98-day carcass was noted in quail of the 2nd test group (Biocinc 0,2 ml/kg), which was 215,56 ± 8,67 g (р ≤ 0,001), which is 69,91 g more than in the control group. The kill yield was 76,3 %, which is 9,9 % more than in the control group. The largest increase in absolute liver weight in 37-day quail was observed with the use of Biocinc at a dose of 0,2 mL/kg – 3,74 ± 0,33 g, relative weight – 3,05 %. 98-day quail – 5,52 ± 0,28 g and 1,95 % when using Biocinc at a dose of 0,2 mL/kg. Vascular changes in the liver have been identified that affect the vessels of all calibers: from the central veins to the sinusoids. This manifests in vasodilation in the control group and vasoconstriction in the experimental quail groups. A decrease in the diameter of the central vein and the width of the sinusoid capillaries indicates an increase in the tone of the vascular wall due to an increase in the contractility of the muscular membrane under the influence of Biocinc. The lowest nuclear cytoplasmic ratio is observed in 2 and 3 experimental groups (0,38) when Biocinc is included in the diet at a dose of 0,2 and 0,3 mL/kg, which is manifested by the highest functional state of hepatocytes.

About the Authors

M. V. Lazareva
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

M.V. Lazareva, PhD in Veterinary Sciences, Associate Professor



H. A. Shkil
Sibirsky Federal Scientific Center of Agrobiotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

H.A. Shkil, Doctor of Veterinary Sciences, Professor



References

1. Babunova V.S., Popov P.A., Osipova I.S., Rossijskij zhurnal Problemy veterinarnoj sanitarii, gigieny i jekologii, 2020, No. 1 (33), рр. 12–16. (In Russ.)

2. Shamko V.V., Ljundyshev V.A., Nauchnye osnovy razvitija APK (Scientific bases of agro-industrial complex development), XXIV Vserossijskoj (nacional’noj) nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii studentov, aspirantov i molodyh uchenyh s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem), Tomsk, 24 aprelja – 10 ijunja 2022, Novosibirsk: “Zolotoj kolos”, 2022, рр. 222–226. (In Russ.)

3. Merfi R. Zhivotnovodstvo Rossii, 2019, vol. 4, pp. 41–44. (In Russ.)

4. Lazareva M.V., Shkil’ N.A., Mezenceva S.V., Vestnik NGAU, 2020, No. 3 (56), pp. 110–115. (In Russ.)

5. Provorova N.A., Dezhatkin M.E., Kremnij i zhizn’. Kremnistye porody v sel’skom hozjajstve, 2021, pp. 195–199. (In Russ.)

6. Lazareva M.V., Lazareva I.S., Shkil’ N.A., Veterinarija, 2021, No. 8, pp. 49–51. (In Russ.)

7. Mezenceva S.V., Lazareva M.V., Stacevich L.N., Vestnik NGAU, 2022, No. 4 (65), pp. 153–159. (In Russ.)

8. Bandurko V.V., Gusova B.D., Dzhagaev A.Ju., Seidov I.S., Innovacionnye tehnologii proizvodstva i pererabotki sel’skohozjajstvennoj produkcii (Innovative technologies of production and processing of agricultural products), Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii v chest’ 90-letija fakul’teta tehnologicheskogo menedzhmenta, Vladikavkaz, 14–16 nojabrja 2019, Vladikavkaz: Gorskij GAU, 2019, vol. 1, pp. 396–400. (In Russ.)

9. Lemeshhenko V.V., Golovchenko V.V., Izvestija sel’skohozjajstvennoj nauki Tavridy, 2021, No. 28 (191), pp. 112–117. (In Russ.)

10. Rastrizhenkova V.K., Lazareva M.V., Aktual’nye voprosy akusherstva, ginekologii i reproduktologii zhivotnyh (Actual issues of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductology of animals), Nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii studentov instituta veterinarnoj mediciny i biotehnologii Novosibirskogo GAU, Novosibirsk, 15 ijulja 2023, Novosibirsk: “Zolotoj kolos”, 2023, pp. 41–44. (In Russ.)

11. Skovorodin E.N., Bazekin G.V., Bronnikova G.Z., Vestnik Bashkirskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2020, No. 1, pp. 114–125. (In Russ.)

12. Akaichi A., Jebali A., Benlarbi M., Mahjoub T., Kaboudi K., Chaouacha-Chekir R.B., Research in Veterinary Science, 2022, vol. 150, P. 179–188.

13. Yusof H.M., Mohamad R., Zaidan U.H., Arshad M.A., Samsudin A.A., Journal of Trace Elements and Minerals, 2023, vol. 4, P. 100072.

14. Ramiah S.K., Awad E.A., Mookiah S., Idrus Z., Poultry science, 2019, vol. 98, No. 9, P. 3828–3838.

15. Elsayed A.A.M., Abol-Ela S.S., Askar A.A., Mohamed L.A., El-Sayed S.A., Ahmed S.Y., Poultry Science, 2021, vol. 100, No. 11, P. 101463.

16. Sahin N., Kucuk O., Orhan C., Savasli E., Cakmak I., Biological Trace Element Research, 2022, vol. 200, No. 8, P. 3774–3784.


Review

For citations:


Lazareva M.V., Shkil H.A. Effect of zinc chelate on slaughter and liver morphology of quail. Innovations and Food Safety. 2024;(4):35-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/2311-0651-2024-46-4-35-42

Views: 36


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-0651 (Print)