Preview

Innovations and Food Safety

Advanced search

DISTRIBUTION AND PHENOTYPIC PROPERTIES OF ATYPICAL MYCOBACTERIA ISOLATED FROM PIGS AND AMBIENT MEDIUM OBJECTS

https://doi.org/10.31677/2311-0651-2022-35-1-90-100

Abstract

In this article, the authors reviewed an experiment in which 106 cultures of acid-fast mycobacteria (8.8%) were isolated. These cultures were isolated by bacteriological examination of 1207 biomaterial samples from pigs, birds and environmental samples. From the biomaterial of pigs reactive to tuberculin, 7.5% cultures were isolated. From the biomaterial of backyard chickens on the pig farmer’s farm 12.5% of samples were isolated; 120 samples were isolated from synanthropic birds (pigeons, sparrows). Of these, on-farm birds accounted for 7.5%; 9.4% were isolated from environmental samples outside the premises of the pig farm. The study of phenotypic properties showed the belonging of isolated cultures of mycobacteria to three groups according to Runyon classification (II, III and IV). The authors found that 6 species of atypical mycobacteria, including M. xenopi, M. avium-intracellulare, M. fortuitum, M. smegmatis, M. phlei and M. scrofulaceum. The presence of mycobacteria was confirmed by cultural, morphological and biochemical properties. In the species composition of mycobacterial cultures, M. avium-intracellulare was the most common with 51.4 %, M. smegmatis with 20.8 % and M. scrofulaceum with 11.1 %.

About the Authors

Iu. I. Smolyaninov
Institute of Experimental Veterinary Medicine of Siberia and the Far East, Siberian Federal Research Centre for Agrobiotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SFRCA RAS)
Russian Federation

 Doctor of Veterinary Sciences, Professor 



D. V. Volkov
Institute of Experimental Veterinary Medicine of Siberia and the Far East, Siberian Federal Research Centre for Agrobiotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SFRCA RAS)
Russian Federation

 Ph.D. in Veterinary Sciences 



S. V. Ionina
Institute of Experimental Veterinary Medicine of Siberia and the Far East, Siberian Federal Research Centre for Agrobiotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SFRCA RAS)
Russian Federation

 Ph.D. in Veterinary Sciences 



A. K. Brem
Institute of Experimental Veterinary Medicine of Siberia and the Far East, Siberian Federal Research Centre for Agrobiotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SFRCA RAS)
Russian Federation

 Ph.D. in Veterinary Sciences 



References

1. Najmanov A.H., Tolstenko N.G., Vangeli E.P., Kalmykov V.M., Veterinariya, 2016, No. 11, pp. 3–6. (In Russ.)

2. Liepin’sh E.A. Kraevye osobennosti etiologii i diagnostiki tuberkulyoza u svinej v Latvijskoj SSR (Regional features of the etiology and diagnosis of tuberculosis in pigs in the Latvian SSR), Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis, Tartu, 1975, 24 p. (In Russ.)

3. Kozlov N.N. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie voprosy veterinarii, Tartu, 1977, Vol. I, pp. 75–78. (In Russ.) Rumachik I.I. Tuberkuleznye izmeneniya u svinej i ih etiologiya (Tuberculous changes in pigs and their etiology), Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis, Minsk, 1980, 21 p. (In Russ.)

4. Rumachik I.I. Tuberkuleznye izmeneniya u svinej i ih etiologiya (Tuberculous changes in pigs and their etiology), Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis, Minsk, 1980, 21 p. (In Russ.)

5. Nechval’ I.T. Mikobakterioz svinej (epizootologiya, diagnostika, profilaktika i meropriyatiya po ih likvidacii) (Mycobacteriosis of pigs (epizootology, diagnosis, prevention and measures for their elimination)), Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis, Moscow, 1986, 46 p. (In Russ.)

6. Nurmadov K. Profilakticheskie i lechebno-veterinarnye meropriyatiya v zhivotnovodcheskih kompleksah, Dushanbe, 1987, pp. 4-8. (In Russ.)

7. Soloneko A.A., Sahonchik P.E. Veterinarnaya nauka – proizvodstvu, Minsk, 1988, Vol. 26, pp. 37–44. (In Russ.)

8. Pakusina T.A., Okolelov V.I. Veterinariya sel’skohozyajstvennyh zhivotnyh, 2009, No. 5, pp. 33–38. (In Russ.)

9. Nastavlenie po primeneniyu (PPD) tuberkulinov dlya mlekopitayushchih i dlya ptic (Instructions for use (DPO) of tuberculins for mammals and birds), Moscow, 1999.

10. Nastavlenie po diagnostike tuberkuleza zhivotnyh (Manual for the diagnosis of animal tuberculosis), Moscow, 2002.

11. Runyon E. Differenciation des mycobacteria anonimes (atypiques) et des bacillus tuberculosis des mamileres, Bull. Union Intern. tuberc.,1959, Vol. 29, No. 1–2, pp. 72–83.

12. Kadochkin A.M. Veterinariya, 1984, No. 9, pp. 62–64. (In Russ.)

13. Gulyukin M.I., Najmanov A.H., Ovdienko N.P. i dr., Metodicheskie nastavleniya po provedeniyu issledovanij pri mikobakteriozah zhivotnyh (Methodological instructions for conducting research in animal mycobacteriosis), Moscow, 2012, 85 p.

14. Kubica G.P. The current nomenclature of the mycobacteria, Bull. Int. Union Against Tuberc, 1979, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 204–211.

15. Kappler W. Klassifizierung und Identifizierung von jangsan waehsenden atypischen mycobacterien, Z. Tuberk, 1968, Jg. 127, pp. 31–35.

16. Makarevich N.M. Atipichnye mikobakterii: metody identifikacii, istochniki vydeleniya, techenie, klinika tuberkuleza (Atypical mycobacteria: identification methods, sources of isolation, course, tuberculosis clinic), Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis, Moscow, 1973, 37 p.

17. Tsukamura M.A. Review of the metods of identification and differentiation of Mycobacteria, Rev. Ifest. Dis, 1981, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 844–861.

18. Wayne L.G. Classification and identification of mycobacteria, Amer. Rev. Resp. Dis, 1967, Vol. 96, pp. 88–95.

19. Szabo I., Vandra F. Classification des mycobacteries saprophites, Rev. Immunol, 1961, Vol. 25, No. 5–6, pp. 372–378.

20. Nagayama H., Konno K., Oka S. Formamidase in mycobacteria from other mycobacteria, Nature, 1961, Vol. 190, pp. 219–221.

21. Kilburn J.O., Silcox V.A., Kubica G.P. Differential identification of mycobacteria. V. The tellurite reduction test, Amer. Rev. Respir. Dis, 1969, Vol. 99 (1), pp. 94–100.

22. Kestle D., Abolt V., Kubica G. Differencial identification of mycobacteria. II. Subgroups of groups II and III (Runyon) with different clinical significance, Amer. Rev. Resp. Dis, 1967, Vol. 95, pp. 1041–1052.


Review

For citations:


Smolyaninov I.I., Volkov D.V., Ionina S.V., Brem A.K. DISTRIBUTION AND PHENOTYPIC PROPERTIES OF ATYPICAL MYCOBACTERIA ISOLATED FROM PIGS AND AMBIENT MEDIUM OBJECTS. Innovations and Food Safety. 2022;(1):90-100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31677/2311-0651-2022-35-1-90-100

Views: 152


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-0651 (Print)